State ex rel. Pierce v. Industrial Commission
Ohio Supreme Court
1Per curiam
Claimant characterizes the commission’s order as Noii-deficient and seeks relief consistent with State ex rel. Gay v. Mihm (1994), 68 Ohio St.3d 315, 626 N.E.2d 666. The court of appeals agreed with claimant’s underlying contention, but did not invoke Gay. We affirm its judgment.
The commission’s order violates Noll because it does not explain how claimant’s nonmedical factors combine to make him work-amenable. The commission’s mere acknowledgment of claimant’s age and education is not enough. State ex rel. Moss v. Indus. Comm. (1996), 75 Ohio St.3d 414, 662 N.E.2d 364; see State ex rel. Hanna…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- State ex rel. Gay v. MihmOhio Supreme Court · 1994
- State ex rel. Moss v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1996
- State ex rel. Haddix v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1994
- State ex rel. Hanna v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1994
3Cited by7 opinions
- State ex rel. Jackson v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1997
- State ex rel. Barnett v. Indus. Comm.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2015
- State ex rel. Jackson v. Indus. Comm.Ohio Supreme Court · 1997
- State ex rel. Pierce v. Indus. Comm.Ohio Supreme Court · 1997
- State Ex Rel. Patrick v. Indus. Comm., 06ap-781 (7-24-2007)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2007
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.