Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Haddix v. Industrial Commission

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided August 10, 1994No. 93-1449PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Per curiam

Claimant seeks a writ of mandamus to compel a permanent total disability award that is consistent with our recent decision in State ex rel. Gay v. Mihm (1994), 68 Ohio St.3d 315, 626 N.E.2d 666. The commission wants its order reinstated, and essentially contends that Noll has not been violated. Upon review, we favor claimant’s position.

As is true with all disputes arising under Noll and Gay, the success of claimant’s permanent total disability application rests on the interpretation given his nonmedical disability factors. In this case, the commission’s order is internally inconsistent.

*61The…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. State ex rel. Gay v. MihmOhio Supreme Court · 1994

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Barnett v. Indus. Comm.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2015
  2. State ex rel. King v. TrimbleOhio Supreme Court · 1996
  3. State ex rel. Pierce v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1997
  4. State ex rel. Rhoten v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1996
  5. State ex rel. Pierce v. Indus. Comm.Ohio Supreme Court · 1997

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API