Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Hanna v. Industrial Commission

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided April 27, 1994No. 93-93PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Per curiam

We are asked to preliminarily determine whether the commission’s permanent total disability order satisfies Noll. If it does not, we must further decide whether to: (1) return the cause to the commission for further explanation per Noll or (2) simply order the commission to grant permanent total disability compensation pursuant to State ex rel. Gay v. Mihm (1994), 68 Ohio St.3d 315, 626 N.E.2d 666. We favor the first alternative.

As is increasingly the case, the commission’s order combines vocational factors that are both favorable and unfavorable without explaining how these factors make…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. State ex rel. Gay v. MihmOhio Supreme Court · 1994

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Pierce v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1997
  2. State ex rel. Byrd v. American Standard, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1997
  3. State ex rel. Pierce v. Indus. Comm.Ohio Supreme Court · 1997
  4. State ex rel. Byrd v. Am. Std., Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1997
  5. State ex rel. Hanna v. Indus. Comm.Ohio Supreme Court · 1994

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API