Legal Opinion

Maples v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.

California Court of Appeal

Decided August 9, 1978No. Civ. 41409PublishedCited by 45 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

WHITE, P. J.

This is an appeal from the granting of summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff in a declaratory relief action. The action sought a declaration that the plaintiff was covered by insurance for a fire occurring after termination of the policy where the boiler installation work allegedly causing the fire occurred during the policy period. The learned trial judge, Honorable W. G. Watson, Jr., declared that there was coverage, reasoning that the plaintiff’s cause and circumstances “nearly coincide” with those existing in Sylla v. United States Fid. & Guar. Co. (1976) 54…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Auto Equity Sales, Inc. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1962
  2. Gray v. Zurich Insurance Co.California Supreme Court · 1966
  3. Geddes & Smith, Inc. v. Saint Paul Mercuy Indemnity Co.California Supreme Court · 1959
  4. Remmer v. Glens Falls Indemnity Co.California Court of Appeal · 1956
  5. Maxon v. Security Insurance of New Haven ConnecticutCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1963

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by45 opinions

  1. Aerojet-General Corp. v. Transport Indemnity Co.California Court of Appeal · 1997
  2. Uniroyal, Inc. v. Home InsuranceDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1988
  3. In Re San Juan Dupont Plaza Hotel Fire LitigationCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1993
  4. Villella v. Public Employees Mutual InsuranceWashington Supreme Court · 1986
  5. Commercial Union Insurance v. Porter Hayden Co.Court of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1997

40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API