Legal Opinion

Romberg v. Hediger

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided February 18, 1896No. 5955PublishedCited by 8 opinions

Error from the .district court of Cuming county. Tried below before Norris, J.

1Opinion of the CourtNorval, J.

Rudolph Hediger sued John Romberg in the court below to recover damages alleged to have been sustained by reason of his having been ejected from a certain farm in Cuming county at the instance of the defendant under a writ of restitution on a judgment in an action of forcible detainer, wherein Romberg was plaintiff and Hediger was • defendant, after an appeal undertaking had been filed by said Hediger, and after the justice before whom said cause was tried had recalled said writ of restitution. To the petition in the case before us the defendant answered, admitting certain averments therein,…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Romberg v. FokkenNebraska Supreme Court · 1896
  2. Willis v. StateNebraska Supreme Court · 1889

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Home Fire Insurance v. WeedNebraska Supreme Court · 1898
  2. Union Pacific Railroad v. KinneyNebraska Supreme Court · 1896
  3. Oltmanns v. FindlayNebraska Supreme Court · 1896
  4. Palmer v. MiznerNebraska Supreme Court · 1903
  5. Spurck v. DeanNebraska Supreme Court · 1896

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API