Spurck v. Dean
Nebraska Supreme Court
Error from the district court of Nuckolls county. Tried below before Hastings, J.
1Opinion of the CourtHarrison, J.
The plaintiff instituted this action to recover of defendant an amount alleged to be due as compensation for work and labor performed by plaintiff for defendant during the times stated in the petition filed, wherein there also appeared an allegation that the work was done at a stipulated or agreed price per week. Issues were joined and tried and the result was a judgment for plaintiff, seeking a reversal of which defendant has prosecuted error proceedings to this court.
Of the alleged errors the one mainly urged and relied Apon in the argument as being fatal to the judgment rendered is that…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Romberg v. FokkenNebraska Supreme Court · 1896
- Sycamore Marsh Harvester Co. v. GrundradNebraska Supreme Court · 1884
- Childerson v. ChildersonNebraska Supreme Court · 1896
- Romberg v. HedigerNebraska Supreme Court · 1896
- Fry v. TiltonNebraska Supreme Court · 1881
3Cited by6 opinions
- Union Pacific Railroad v. FickenscherNebraska Supreme Court · 1905
- Seevers v. Cleveland Coal Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1916
- Beatrice Savings Bank v. Beatrice Chautauqua AssemblyNebraska Supreme Court · 1898
- Coy v. MillerNebraska Supreme Court · 1898
- State ex rel. Gray v. School DistrictNebraska Supreme Court · 1897
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.