Legal Opinion

Oltmanns v. Findlay

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided March 3, 1896No. 6170PublishedCited by 8 opinions

Error from the district court of Nemaha county. Tried below before Bush, J.

1Opinion of the CourtHarrison, J.

The defendants in error commenced this action, against the plaintiffs in error, alleging as the cause thereof, in substance, that on or about the 15th day of August they purchased of plaintiffs in error a horse, or stallion for general breeding purposes; that the value of a horse for such use depends largely upon his being well bred or pure stock; that plaintiffs in error, to induce defendants in error to purchase the horse, falsely and fraudulently represented to “them that said horse was a thoroughly bred German coach horse, registered in the stud book of Germany, and that they would…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Wax v. StateNebraska Supreme Court · 1894
  2. Scott v. SpencerNebraska Supreme Court · 1894
  3. Romberg v. HedigerNebraska Supreme Court · 1896
  4. Willis v. StateNebraska Supreme Court · 1889
  5. Glass v. ZutavernNebraska Supreme Court · 1895

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Andres v. KridlerNebraska Supreme Court · 1896
  2. Application of City of LincolnNebraska Supreme Court · 1963
  3. Home Fire Insurance v. WeedNebraska Supreme Court · 1898
  4. Kingman & Co. v. PixleySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1898
  5. Hazelet v. Holt CountyNebraska Supreme Court · 1897

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API