Legal Opinion

United States v. Herbert Mack

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided March 30, 1995No. 92-3519PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SUHRHEINRICH, Circuit Judge.

In our original decision, the court held that defendant Herbert Mack’s sentence enhancement under the Armed Career Criminal Act (“ACCA”), 18 U.S.C. § 924(e), 1 could not be sustained because the three prior “violent felony” convictions for sexual battery under Ohio law, upon which the enhancement was based, were not “violent felonies” within the meaning of 18 U.S.C. § 924(e)(2)(B). 2 United States v. Mack, 8 F.3d 1109 (6th Cir.1993) (per curiam). The government filed a petition for rehearing en banc, and on January 10, 1994, the full court agreed to hold the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Taylor v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
  2. United States v. Robert Paul KaplanskyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1994
  3. United States v. Brenda Tucker and Barbara McDonaldCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1994
  4. United States v. Herbert MackCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1993
  5. United States v. KaplanskyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1993

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. United States v. Jerry F. ArnoldCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1995
  2. United States v. George William Blood (04-5101) and Stephen L. Crittenden (04-5261)Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2006
  3. United States v. Wesley HargroveCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2005
  4. United States of America, Plaintiff-Appellee/cross-Appellant v. Johnnie Edgar Warwick, Defendant-Appellant/cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1999
  5. United States v. BranhamCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1996

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API