United States v. George William Blood (04-5101) and Stephen L. Crittenden (04-5261)
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
MOORE, Circuit Judge.
This case presents a question of first impression for this court: the meaning of the phrase “with intent to deceive another” found in 18 U.S.C. § 513(a), which prohibits possession of counterfeit and forged securities with this deceptive intent. The Defendants-Appellants George Blood and Stephen Crittenden appeal their convictions and sentences for violation of 18 U.S.C. § 513(a) on a number of grounds. Defendant Blood appeals his conviction based on insufficiency of the evidence, improper jury instructions, prosecutorial misconduct, judicial bias, and outrageous…
2Cases cited58 opinions
- Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Apprendi v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- United States v. BookerSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- Giglio v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
53 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by88 opinions
- United States v. Roger D. BlackwellCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2006
- Mirna Serrano v. Cintas CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2012
- United States v. KuehneCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2008
- United States v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2009
- Radvansky v. City of Olmsted FallsCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2007
83 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.