Legal Opinion

United States v. Kaplansky

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided November 29, 1993No. 92-3744PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

A majority of the Judges of this Court in regular active service have voted for rehearing of this case en banc. Sixth Circuit Rule 14 provides as follows:

The effect of the granting of a hearing en banc shall be to vacate the previous opinion and judgment of this court, to stay the mandate and to restore the case on the docket sheet as a pending appeal.

Accordingly, it is ORDERED that the previous decision and judgment of this court is vacated, the mandate is stayed and this case is restored to the docket as a pending appeal.

The Clerk will direct the parties to file supplemental briefs and…

2Cited by6 opinions

  1. United States v. Robert Paul KaplanskyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1994
  2. United States v. William F. Dolt, IIICourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1994
  3. United States v. Herbert MackCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1995
  4. United States v. Herbert MackCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1993
  5. United States v. Herbert MackCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1993

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API