Legal Opinion
Bowling v. Blackwell Zinc Company
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided December 13, 1960No. 39124PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
JACKSON, Justice.
The back injury for which claimant, Marvin C. Bowling, seeks recovery, occurred on February 26th o>r 27th, 1953, while he was working for respondent, Blackwell Zinc Company, Inc. He 'was paid two "weeks temporary compensation at $25 per week, was provided medical services and braces for his back and returned to work. Claimant’s back continued to give him trouble and in 1958 and 1959 hearings were conducted in the Industrial Court to determine the extent of permanent partial disability and for compensation. At that hearing, respondent submitted the report of Dr. L. W. G.,…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Southern Drilling Co. v. DaleySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1933
- Ross v. RossSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1939
- Smith v. ZweifelSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1936
- Bowling v. Blackwell Zinc CompanySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1959
- Phillips Petroleum Co. v. MalcolmSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1936
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Hill v. Culligan Soft Water Service CompanySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1963
- HERB BANISTER PLUMBING COMPANY v. DreadinSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1964
- Green v. Mac's Plating WorksSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1977
- Hamilton v. Midwestern Instruments, Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1962
- Kleener Coal Company v. HamiltonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1961
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.