Legal Opinion

Smith v. Zweifel

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided February 18, 1936No. 26464PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPhelps, J.

On August 1, 1934, the respondent (claimant in the State Industrial Commission) suffered a sunstroke or heatstroke while employed by petitioner Smith as a carpenter in the erection of a-schoolhouse. The commission made an award in his favor for temporary total disability, for the review of which the employer and insurance carrier have instituted this action.

Petitioners’ first contention is that there is no evidence to sustain the finding that the injury arose out of the employment. The evidence on that issue will be more readily understood if we first bring to mind the rule applicable to the…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Stanolind Pipe Line Co. v. DavisSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1935

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Pratt v. WomackSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1961
  2. Bama Pie, Inc. v. RobertsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1977
  3. Gulf Oil Corporation v. GarrisonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1938
  4. Yeatman v. Northern Oklahoma Resource Center of EnidSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2004
  5. Ross v. RossSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1939

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API