Legal Opinion
Hill v. Culligan Soft Water Service Company
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided November 12, 1963No. 40363PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
JACKSON, Judge.
This is an original proceeding by petitioner (claimant) Glen E. Hill for the review of an order of the State Industrial Court en banc denying him an award against respondents, employer and insurance carrier, under the Workmen’s Compensation Law.
Hill was the employee of a partnership composed of himself and his wife, doing business as Culligan Soft Water Service Company. No question is raised as to the right of a partner who is also an employee of the partnership to recover compensation payments as against the partnership and its insurance carrier. The record shows that Hill had…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Protho v. NetteSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1935
- Hackley v. Dalles Nursing HomeSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1962
- Sanders v. State Industrial CommissionSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1958
- Hughes v. Haco Drilling CompanySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1959
- Black, Sivalls & Bryson, Inc. v. StorySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1963
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Ross v. Sayers Well Servicing CompanyNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1966
- Sondag v. Ferris HardwareSupreme Court of Iowa · 1974
- Jorgensen v. Meade Johnson Laboratories, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1973
- HERB BANISTER PLUMBING COMPANY v. DreadinSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1964
- Hill v. Culligan Soft Water Service CompanySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1965
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.