Legal Opinion
Bowling v. Blackwell Zinc Company
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided December 22, 1959No. 38713PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
JACKSON, Justice.
This is an original proceeding by Marvin C. Bowling, claimant, against Blackwell Zinc Company, employer, to obtain a review of an order of the State Industrial Commission denying an award, on ground that the claim was barred for want of prosecution within five years under provisions of House Bill 612, S.L.1953, p. 430 (Title 85 O.S.Supp.1957, Sec. 43). The statute reads, as follows:
“When a claim for compensation shall have been filed with the Commission as herein provided, unless the claimant shall in good faith request a hearing and final determination thereon within five…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Oklahoma Furniture Mfg. Co. v. NolenSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1933
- Gardner v. RV Dillard Drilling CompanySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1955
3Cited by7 opinions
- Roberts v. MerrillSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1963
- Special Indemnity Fund v. BarnesSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1967
- Beatty v. ScottSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1961
- Bowling v. Blackwell Zinc CompanySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1960
- Baker v. DARR EQUIPMENT CO.Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 2010
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.