Legal Opinion

Doherty v. City of Woburn

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided March 1, 1963PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCutter, J.

This is an action at law in seventy counts, 1 each of which is in behalf of a particular plaintiff employed by the city’s department of public works (the department). Bach employee seeks to recover the excess of (a) the wages to which the employee claims to be entitled by virtue of action of the Woburn city council in 1958 and 1959, over (b) the wages actually paid to the employee in accordance with the rates in effect prior to the council action. An auditor made findings, which by stipulation have been treated as final and as constituting all the material facts. The case has been reported…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. BonomiMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1957
  2. Fluet v. McCabeMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1938
  3. Brucato v. City of LawrenceMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1959
  4. Rock v. City of PittsfieldMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1944
  5. Abrams v. Reynolds Metals Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1960

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Boston Teachers Union v. School CommitteeMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1982
  2. Mendes v. City of TauntonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1974
  3. Boston Safe Deposit & Trust Co. v. State Tax CommissionMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1963
  4. Hackett v. City of WorcesterMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1964
  5. Town of Burlington v. Labor Relations CommissionMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1981

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API