Rock v. City of Pittsfield
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
1Opinion of the CourtLummus, J.
The plaintiffs in these three cases are respectively a member of the police department, the fire department, and the labor service of the city of Pittsfield, and are all within the protection of the civil service law. G. L. (Ter. Ed.) c. 31, as amended. They were paid for the first three months of 1943 at the rates in force prior to an ordinance increasing their pay, enacted on October 27, 1942, to take effect on January 1, 1943, and now seek to recover the additional pay for the first three months of 1943 to which that ordinance purported to entitle them. *349The judge found for the plaintiffs,…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Holton v. American Pastry Products Corp.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1931
- Forbes v. Gordon & Gerber, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1937
- Howland v. StoweMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1935
- City of Lowell v. Massachusetts Bonding & InsuranceMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1943
- Breen v. BurnsMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1932
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by31 opinions
- Boston Teachers Union v. School CommitteeMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1982
- Barton v. City of CambridgeMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1945
- Brucato v. City of LawrenceMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1959
- Commonwealth v. SweezeyMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2000
- Opinion of the Justices to the House of RepresentativesMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1948
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.