Town of Burlington v. Labor Relations Commission
Massachusetts Appeals Court
1Opinion of the CourtKass, J.
In October, 1976, the American Federation of State, County and Municipal Employees, AFL-CIO (the union), petitioned the Labor Relations Commission (commission) for certification as the exclusive bargaining agent for the traffic supervisors in Burlington.1 The selectmen of Burlington reacted with some ire and voted an order — “effective immediately” — that traffic supervisors should work *185no more than five hours per day and should not be on the town’s payroll on any day when the schools were closed. That order constituted a reduction in pay because, since 1971, the traffic supervisors had been…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- National Labor Relations Board v. Jones & Laughlin Steel Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1937
- National Labor Relations Board v. Exchange Parts Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Wheelock College v. Massachusetts Commission Against DiscriminationMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1976
- Nash v. Florida Industrial CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Murgia v. Municipal CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1975
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- LeMaine v. City of BostonMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1989
- Town of Lee v. Labor Relations CommissionMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1985
- THOMAS V. RALPH v. CIVIL SERVICE COMMISSION & another.Massachusetts Appeals Court · 2021
- Cote-Whitacre v. Department of Public HealthMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2006