People v. Tindal
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
— Case held, decision reserved and matter remitted to Monroe Supreme Court for hearing, in accordance with the following memorandum: On this appeal from a judgment of conviction for rape in the first degree, defendant contends that he was deprived of his right to counsel because he was interrogated by the police in the absence of an attorney who was representing him on a pending charge (see People v Smith, 54 NY2d 954; People v Bartolomeo, 53 NY2d 225; People v Rogers, 48 NY2d 167). While acknowledging that this issue was not raised in the trial court, defendant correctly observes that his…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- People v. BaldiNew York Court of Appeals · 1981
- People v. RogersNew York Court of Appeals · 1979
- People v. BartolomeoNew York Court of Appeals · 1981
- People v. SmithNew York Court of Appeals · 1981
- People v. ServidioNew York Court of Appeals · 1981
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- People v. RobertsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013
- People v. McGeeAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1989
- People v. SamuelAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1990
- People v. TindalAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1984
- People v. RobertsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.