Legal Opinion

People v. Samuel

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided May 11, 1990PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: Defendant’s primary contention on appeal is that his statement to the police, in which he admitted participating in the July 19, 1979 attempted robbery of the M & T Bank and shooting a bank guard, was taken in violation of his right to counsel. Because defendant’s conviction occurred prior to the determination in People v Bartolomeo (53 NY2d 225), and because the present record is insufficient to determine his claim, we normally would remit the matter and reopen the Huntley hearing to develop a record on that issue (see, People v McGee, 155 AD2d 878;…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. People v. CrimminsNew York Court of Appeals · 1975
  2. People v. BartolomeoNew York Court of Appeals · 1981
  3. People v. AlmesticaNew York Court of Appeals · 1977
  4. People v. FlechaNew York Court of Appeals · 1983
  5. People v. TindalAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1983

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. People v. McNearAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API