People v. Servidio

OPINION OF THE COURT

Memorandum.

The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed.

The defendant acknowledges that the officer who questioned defendant was not aware of the unrelated charge then pending against him and on which he was represented by counsel. Unlike the situation in People v Smith (54 NY2d 954 [decided herewith]), there was, therefore, no basis for *953inferring knowledge of the prior representation from knowledge that there were unrelated charges pending. Nor in view of the minor nature of the charge (unauthorized use of a motor vehicle and resisting arrest) can it be said…