Legal Opinion

United States v. Thomas

United States Court of Military Appeals

Decided February 26, 1954No. 2810PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion of the Court-

Paul W. Brosman, Judge:

Following the joint trial by general court-martial of the persons here accused, their convictions of desertion and of escape from confinement were approved by the convening authority and thereafter by an Army board of review. Subsequent to the initial opinion of the board, the accused moved that the case be reassigned and that a rehearing be granted before a different board of review. The propriety of the refusal to reassign is the question before us now under the granted petition of the accused.

II

After the record of trial had been forwarded…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. United States v. MorganSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
  2. National Labor Relations Board v. Donnelly Garment Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1947
  3. Berlandi v. CommonwealthMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1943
  4. May v. MayCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1912
  5. Sessmer v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1938

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. United States v. HaimsonUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1954
  2. United States v. CattUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1975
  3. United States v. MallicoteUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1962
  4. United States v. LongUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1954

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API