May v. May

Opinion op the Court by

Judge Winn —

Affirming;

Upon the return of the case of May v. May, et al., 109 S. W., 352, to the lower court, W. X. May brought an action to foreclose the $400.mortgage upheld in that decision. Mrs. May, the appellant, filed.her answer, again attaching the validity of, the mortgage. The trial court entered a judgment conformable to the prayer of W. X. May’s petition. Mrs. Julia May appeals.

Appellant urges that an allegation of payment in her answer, based upon certain indorsements upon the note and mortgage evidencing payment, is undenied. There is no reply, it is true;…