Center for Biological Diversity v. Norton
District Court, D. Arizona
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
BURY, District Judge.
Pending before this Court is Defendant’s Motion, filed pursuant to Rule 60(b), Fed.R.Civ.P., to Modify this Court’s Order of February 18, 2003. Defendant argues that it should not be required to comply with this Court’s Order, and therefore the Endangered Species Act (“ESA”), until such time as Congress appropriates sufficient funds for it to do so. For the reasons set forth below, Defendant’s Motion is denied. Alternatively, Defendant seeks an extension of time to comply with this Court’s Order filed February 18, 2003. This Court shall permit a limited extension. No…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Tennessee Valley Authority v. HillSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Plaut v. Spendthrift Farm, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1995
- David A. Clarke v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1990
- Federal Trade Commission v. Affordable Media, LLCCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1999
- UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Leaburn ALEXANDER, Jr., Defendant-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1997
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Wildwest Institute v. AsheDistrict Court, D. Montana · 2014
- Audubon Society of Portland v. JewellDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 2015
- San Francisco Baykeeper v. United States Fish And Wildlife ServiceDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2025
- WildEarth Guardians v. United States Fish and Wildlife ServiceDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 2019