Legal Opinion

Wildwest Institute v. Ashe

District Court, D. Montana

Decided April 25, 2014No. CV 13-06-M-DLCPublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

DANA L. CHRISTENSEN, District Judge.

I. Introduction

Plaintiffs filed suit on January 15, 2013 seeking judicial review of the United States Fish and Wildlife Service’s July 19, 2011 finding that listing of the whitebark pine (Pinus albicaulis) as a threatened or endangered species under the Endangered Species Act is “warranted but precluded.” Plaintiffs claim that the finding was arbitrary and capricious, an abuse of discretion, and otherwise inconsistent with the law and congressional intent for a plethora of reasons.

The Court has before it cross-motions for summary judgment filed by the…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Motor Vehicle Mfrs. Assn. of United States, Inc. v. State Farm Mut. Automobile Ins. Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. Citizens to Preserve Overton Park, Inc. v. VolpeSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  3. Lewis v. Continental Bank Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1990
  4. Tennessee Valley Authority v. HillSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  5. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co. v. Wichita Board of TradeSupreme Court of the United States · 1973

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Brown v. NewsomDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2025
  2. Luminate Home Loans, Inc. v. Better Mortgage Co., et al.District Court, S.D. California · 2026
  3. Rapinoe v. GoreDistrict Court, S.D. California · 2022
  4. San Francisco Baykeeper v. United States Fish And Wildlife ServiceDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2021

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API