Legal Opinion

San Francisco Baykeeper v. United States Fish And Wildlife Service

District Court, N.D. California

Decided September 3, 2025No. 3:25-cv-01360Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 7 SAN FRANCISCO BAYKEEPER, et al., Case No. 25-cv-01360-LJC 8 Plaintiffs, FINDINGS OF FACT AND 9 v. CONCLUSIONS OF LAW 10 UNITED STATES FISH AND WILDLIFE Re: Dkt. Nos. 23, 26 SERVICE, et al., 11 Defendants. 12 13 I. INTRODUCTION 14 This case concerns a petition to list the San Francisco Estuary (ESA) local population of 15 white sturgeon, a large migratory fish that lives in rivers and estuaries, as threatened under the 16 Endangered Species Act (ESA). The parties filed cross-motions for summary judgment, which 17 they…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Amoco Production Co. v. Village of GambellSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  2. New Hampshire Right to Life Political Action Committee v. GardnerCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1996
  3. Natural Resources Defense Council San Diego Baykeeper, Kenneth J. Moser v. Southwest Marine, Inc.,defendant-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
  4. Loper Bright Enterprises v. RaimondoSupreme Court of the United States · 2024
  5. Cottonwood Environmental Law Center v. United States Forest ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2015

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API