Audubon Society of Portland v. Jewell
District Court, D. Oregon
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
PANNER, District Judge:
Magistrate Judge Mark D. Clarke filed a Report and Recommendation, and the matter is now before this court. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B), Fed.R.Civ.P. 72(b). Because Defendants object to the Report and Recommendation, I have reviewed this matter de novo. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C); McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. Commodore Bus. Mach., Inc., 656 F.2d 1309, 1313 (9th Cir.1981).
I agree with the Report and Recommendation that Defendants 1-ORDER should finalize and approve a Comprehensive *1101Conservation Plan no later than August 1, 2016.
CONCLUSION
Magistrate Judge Clarke’s Report…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Gilbert B. Martinez v. Eddie Ylst, Superintendent, California Medical Facility SouthCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1991
- Norton v. Southern Utah Wilderness AllianceSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- Monsanto Co. v. Geertson Seed FarmsSupreme Court of the United States · 2010
- McDonnell Douglas Corporation v. Commodore Business MacHines Inc. And Commodore Business MacHines (Canada) LimitedCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1981
- Sierra Forest Legacy v. ShermanCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Alaska Industrial Development and Export Authority v. BidenDistrict Court, D. Alaska · 2023
- Oregon Natural Desert Ass'n v. Bureau of Land ManagementDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 2022