Legal Opinion

Audubon Society of Portland v. Jewell

District Court, D. Oregon

Decided April 15, 2015No. 1:14-cv-0675-CLPublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

PANNER, District Judge:

Magistrate Judge Mark D. Clarke filed a Report and Recommendation, and the matter is now before this court. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B), Fed.R.Civ.P. 72(b). Because Defendants object to the Report and Recommendation, I have reviewed this matter de novo. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C); McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. Commodore Bus. Mach., Inc., 656 F.2d 1309, 1313 (9th Cir.1981).

I agree with the Report and Recommendation that Defendants 1-ORDER should finalize and approve a Comprehensive *1101Conservation Plan no later than August 1, 2016.

CONCLUSION

Magistrate Judge Clarke’s Report…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Gilbert B. Martinez v. Eddie Ylst, Superintendent, California Medical Facility SouthCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1991
  2. Norton v. Southern Utah Wilderness AllianceSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  3. Monsanto Co. v. Geertson Seed FarmsSupreme Court of the United States · 2010
  4. McDonnell Douglas Corporation v. Commodore Business MacHines Inc. And Commodore Business MacHines (Canada) LimitedCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1981
  5. Sierra Forest Legacy v. ShermanCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Alaska Industrial Development and Export Authority v. BidenDistrict Court, D. Alaska · 2023
  2. Oregon Natural Desert Ass'n v. Bureau of Land ManagementDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 2022

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API