Spinoso v. Rio Rancho Estates, Inc.
New Mexico Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
ANDREWS, Judge.
This suit was brought to recover damages for construction defects in the building of a house. The plaintiffs, Frank and Mary Spinoso (Spinosos) entered into an agreement with Rio Rancho Estates, Inc. (Rio Rancho) to purchase a lot on which a subsidiary, Amrep Construction Corporation, was to construct a house. The agreement, drawn by Rio Rancho, included the following provision:
Seller agrees, at its sole cost and expense, to remedy any substantial defect in workmanship or materials of the structural components of the dwelling that shall be called to its attention by…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Matter of 440 E. 102nd St. Corp. v. MurdockNew York Court of Appeals · 1941
- Schultz & Lindsay Construction Co. v. StateNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1972
- Hardy v. Montgomery Ward & Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1971
- Koenigshofer v. ShumateAppellate Court of Illinois · 1966
- Baxter v. Illinois Police FederationAppellate Court of Illinois · 1978
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Antigua Condominium Ass'n v. Melba Investors Atlantic, Inc.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1986
- State v. DoeNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1984
- Manuel Lujan Ins., Inc. v. JordanNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1983
- Beckstead v. Deseret Roofing Co., Inc.Court of Appeals of Utah · 1992
- Cres Rivera Concrete Co. v. Bill Stuckman Construction Co. (In Re Cres Rivera Concrete Co.)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. New Mexico · 1982
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.