Legal Opinion

State v. Doe

New Mexico Court of Appeals

Decided November 6, 1984No. 7733PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

DONNELLY, Chief Judge.

John Doe appeals from a judgment and sentence imposed after conviction of possession of a controlled substance (heroin) with intent to traffic, contrary to NMSA 1978, Section 30-31-20 (Repl.Pamp. 1980). Two issues are presented on appeal: (1) whether defendant’s prosecution and conviction were barred by an agreement not to prosecute; and (2) whether the defendant’s conviction for trafficking in heroin was supported by sufficient evidence. Other issues raised in the docketing statement but not briefed are deemed abandoned. State v. Burdex, 100 N.M. 197, 668 P.2d…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Santobello v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  2. State v. TorresNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1970
  3. State v. HutchinsonNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1983
  4. State v. TovarNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1982
  5. State v. BacaNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1974

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. State v. LarsonNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1988
  2. State v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2010
  3. Hall v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1993
  4. Russell v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1993
  5. State v. VestNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2011

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API