Legal Opinion

State v. Meggerson

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided October 23, 2020No. 117131PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF KANSAS No. 117,131 STATE OF KANSAS, Appellee, v. CECIL MEGGERSON, Appellant. SYLLABUS BY THE COURT 1. Issues not properly briefed are waived or abandoned. 2. A litigant who alleges error bears the burden of designating a sufficient record on appeal to show error. 3. A person trained in the use and maintenance of a jail telephone system and its records is qualified to lay sufficient foundation testimony for that system. 4. If a district court properly admitted evidence under one enumerated exception listed in K.S.A. 2019 Supp. 60-455(b), appellate courts…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. State v. ChandlerSupreme Court of Kansas · 2018
  2. State v. InghamSupreme Court of Kansas · 2018
  3. State v. ArnettSupreme Court of Kansas · 2018
  4. Nauheim v. City of TopekaSupreme Court of Kansas · 2019
  5. State v. SalarySupreme Court of Kansas · 2019

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. State v. D.W.Supreme Court of Kansas · 2024
  2. State v. ShipleyCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 2022
  3. State v. StuartSupreme Court of Kansas · 2024
  4. State v. ValdezSupreme Court of Kansas · 2021
  5. Armstrong v. StateCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 2025

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API