State v. Chandler
Supreme Court of Kansas
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the court was delivered by Biles, J.:
*716 In a criminal prosecution, the State's obligation is to ensure its case is vigorously, but properly, championed to bring about a just conviction-not merely a win. Prosecutors are the State's instrument in fulfilling this duty. When they fail, our system **659 fails, and the safeguards protecting the constitutional right to a fair trial strain to the breaking point. That is what happened in this case. To its credit, the State belatedly concedes one serious prosecutorial error, although there were more. We reverse Dana L. Chandler's…
2Cases cited47 opinions
- Chapman v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Alleyne v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2013
- Doyle v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- United States v. Socony-Vacuum Oil Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1940
- Lockhart v. NelsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
42 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by158 opinions
- State v. BodineSupreme Court of Kansas · 2021
- State v. HolleySupreme Court of Kansas · 2021
- State v. MeggersonSupreme Court of Kansas · 2020
- State v. ThomasSupreme Court of Kansas · 2020
- State v. CrosbySupreme Court of Kansas · 2021
153 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.