Legal Opinion

State v. D.W.

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided March 15, 2024No. 125637PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF KANSAS No. 125,637 STATE OF KANSAS, Appellee, v. D.W., Appellant. SYLLABUS BY THE COURT 1. The contemporaneous objection rule under K.S.A. 60-404 requires a party to make a timely and specific objection at trial to preserve an evidentiary challenge for appellate review. The statute has the practical effect of confining a party's appellate arguments to the grounds presented to the district court. 2. An appellate court reviews the admission of video evidence by first determining whether the challenged evidence is relevant. If the video evidence is relevant,…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. State v. CashSupreme Court of Kansas · 2011
  2. State v. TagueSupreme Court of Kansas · 2013
  3. State v. MarinelliSupreme Court of Kansas · 2018
  4. State v. MeggersonSupreme Court of Kansas · 2020
  5. State v. JacksonSupreme Court of Kansas · 2010

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. State v. FarrCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 2026
  2. State v. RomeySupreme Court of Kansas · 2025

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API