Legal Opinion

Nauheim v. City of Topeka

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided January 11, 2019No. 114271PublishedCited by 95 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by Biles, J.:

*649 **146 Whenever federal funding is not involved, and real property is acquired by a condemning authority through negotiation in advance of a condemnation action or through a condemnation action, the authority must pay relocation benefits to any person who moves from the property as a direct result of the acquisition. K.S.A. 2017 Supp. 26-518(a) (condemning authority's duties to displaced person in acquiring real property); 42 U.S.C. § 4601 (6)(A)(i)(I) (2012) (definition of displaced person). This appeal seeks to define what the statutory…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. In the Interest of B.D.-Y.Supreme Court of Kansas · 2008
  2. Ullery v. OthickSupreme Court of Kansas · 2016
  3. Graham v. Dokter Trucking GroupSupreme Court of Kansas · 2007
  4. SHAMBERG, JOHNSON & BERGMAN v. OliverSupreme Court of Kansas · 2009
  5. Whaley v. SharpSupreme Court of Kansas · 2014

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by95 opinions

  1. State v. MeggersonSupreme Court of Kansas · 2020
  2. Grover v. City of ManhattanSupreme Court of Kansas · 1967
  3. John Doe v. M.J.Supreme Court of Kansas · 2022
  4. State v. LevySupreme Court of Kansas · 2021
  5. In re M.M.Supreme Court of Kansas · 2021

90 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API