Nauheim v. City of Topeka
Supreme Court of Kansas
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the court was delivered by Biles, J.:
*649 **146 Whenever federal funding is not involved, and real property is acquired by a condemning authority through negotiation in advance of a condemnation action or through a condemnation action, the authority must pay relocation benefits to any person who moves from the property as a direct result of the acquisition. K.S.A. 2017 Supp. 26-518(a) (condemning authority's duties to displaced person in acquiring real property); 42 U.S.C. § 4601 (6)(A)(i)(I) (2012) (definition of displaced person). This appeal seeks to define what the statutory…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- In the Interest of B.D.-Y.Supreme Court of Kansas · 2008
- Ullery v. OthickSupreme Court of Kansas · 2016
- Graham v. Dokter Trucking GroupSupreme Court of Kansas · 2007
- SHAMBERG, JOHNSON & BERGMAN v. OliverSupreme Court of Kansas · 2009
- Whaley v. SharpSupreme Court of Kansas · 2014
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by95 opinions
- State v. MeggersonSupreme Court of Kansas · 2020
- Grover v. City of ManhattanSupreme Court of Kansas · 1967
- John Doe v. M.J.Supreme Court of Kansas · 2022
- State v. LevySupreme Court of Kansas · 2021
- In re M.M.Supreme Court of Kansas · 2021
90 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.