Ingle v. Ingle
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
MARTIN (Harry C.), Judge.
An award of alimony pendente lite requires proof that the claiming party is a dependent spouse and that the other party is the supporting spouse, as well as the proof of grounds entitling claimant to alimony pendente lite. Before the hearing on alimony pendente lite, plaintiff and defendant entered into stipulations, inter alia, that defendant is a dependent spouse entitled to alimony pendente lite and that plaintiff is a supporting spouse for the purposes of an alimony pendente lite award. The parties further stipulated that grounds existed for the entry of an order…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Eudy v. EudySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1975
- Beall v. BeallSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1976
- State v. SmithSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1976
- Schloss v. SchlossSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1968
- Little v. LittleCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1970
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Balawejder v. BalawejderCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2011
- Allah v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1985
- Smith v. McKinnonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2014