Legal Opinion

Smith v. PFIZER INC.

District Court, M.D. Tennessee

Decided February 19, 2010No. Case 3:05-0444PublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM

ALETA A. TRAUGER, District Judge.

Pending before the court is the Motion for Summary Judgment filed by defendants Pfizer Inc. and Warner-Lambert Company LLC (Docket No. 17), the plaintiffs response (Docket No. 51), and the defendants’ reply (Docket No. 55). For the reasons discussed below, the defendants’ motion will be denied.

FACTS

On May 13, 2004, 79-year-old Richard Smith (“Smith”) committed suicide. 1 Two months earlier, Smith had filled a prescription for the medication Neurontin, which is manufactured by defendants Pfizer Inc. and Warner-Lambert Company LLC (collectively,…

2Cases cited49 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. Arizona v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  5. Wyeth v. LevineSupreme Court of the United States · 2009

44 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. Charolette Payne v. Novartis Pharm. Corp.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2014
  2. In re Chrysler-Dodge-Jeep Ecodiesel Mktg.District Court, N.D. California · 2018
  3. Cotten v. WilsonTennessee Supreme Court · 2019
  4. Bearden v. Honeywell International Inc.District Court, M.D. Tennessee · 2010
  5. Karst v. Shur-Co.South Dakota Supreme Court · 2016

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API