Legal Opinion

Whitehurst v. Stuart

California Supreme Court

Decided July 18, 1900No. S.F. No. 1348PublishedCited by 2 opinions

The facts are stated in the opinion of tiie court.

1Opinion of the CourtHarrison, J.

The plaintiff seeks by this action to recover from the defendant as a stockholder in the Standard Gold & Silver Mining Company, a corporation, a certain sum of money as and for his proportion of the indebtedness of the corporation. Judgment by default for the amount claimed was entered against the defendant, and he has appealed therefrom upon the ground that the complaint fails to state a cause of action against him.

The complaint sets forth the existence of the corporation and the amount of its capital stock, and also sets forth certain promissory notes transferred to the plaintiff, which are…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Cushing v. PiresCalifornia Supreme Court · 1899
  2. Knowles v. SandercockCalifornia Supreme Court · 1895
  3. Hill v. HaskinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1875
  4. Case Plow Works v. MontgomeryCalifornia Supreme Court · 1896

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Duke v. HuntingtonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1900
  2. Mode, Ltd. v. MyersIdaho Supreme Court · 1917

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API