Legal Opinion

Skinner v. Coy

California Supreme Court

Decided May 5, 1939No. L. A. No. 16673PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

THE COURT.

After further study of the record in this case, we are of the opinion that the District Court of Appeal arrived at the correct conclusion in its opinion filed in this action, and written by Judge Charles C. Haines of the Superior Court in and for the County of San Diego while sitting as a member of the District Court of Appeal, Fourth District. We have adopted in part the opinion of the District Court and have followed the same by certain conclusions of our own. That portion of said opinion which we have adopted, reads as follows:

“This action was brought by respondents, S. A.…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Lawton v. SteeleSupreme Court of the United States · 1894
  2. Miller v. SchoeneSupreme Court of the United States · 1928
  3. State v. MainSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1897
  4. Miller v. HortonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1891
  5. Train v. Boston Disinfecting Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1887

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. People Ex Rel. Lockyer v. Sun Pacific Farming Co.California Court of Appeal · 2000
  2. Corneal v. State Plant BoardSupreme Court of Florida · 1957
  3. Farmers Ins. Exchange v. State of CaliforniaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1985
  4. People v. AmdurCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1954
  5. Teresi v. State of CaliforniaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1986

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API