Legal Opinion

Tan v. United States

United States Court of Claims

Decided February 5, 1952No. 50277PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*553HOWELL, Judge.

On August 14, 1951, plaintiff filed suit to recover $78,956.01 which represents the alleged value of lumber and other materials furnished to the United States Army Corps of Engineers at Santo Tomas, Luzon, during the period from about October 1 to November 3, 1941. Defendant has moved, pursuant to Rule 16(b), 28 U.S.C., to dismiss plaintiff’s petition on the ground that the claim is barred by the Statute of Limitations, 28 U.S.C. (Supp. IV) § 2501, 62 Stat. 976. The arguments presented by both parties are similar to those discussed in Marcos v. U. S., Ct.Cl., 102 F.Supp. 547,…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Marcos v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1952
  2. Cohen, Goldman & Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1933
  3. Smith v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1929
  4. Ylagan v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1944
  5. Schaeffer v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1949

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. Soriano v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  2. Friedman v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1962
  3. Marcos v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1952
  4. Frank E. Lipp v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1962
  5. Lipp v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1962

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API