Legal Opinion

Earle v. Inhabitants of Concord

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided July 1, 1927PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRugg, C.J.

The allegations of the plaintiff’s substitute declaration are that while a traveller he was injured by reason of a defect in a public way in the defendant town. With respect to that defect it is alleged that the defendant entered into an agreement with the owner of land adjacent to the highway, whereby he gave to the defendant authority to dump garbage, ashes, waste paper and-other refuse upon his land for the purpose of filling the same; that the defendant permitted one Corkum, at his own sole cost and expense, to collect such material from houses and to dump the same on this land; that the…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Bolster v. City of LawrenceMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1917
  2. Haley v. City of BostonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1906
  3. Hayes v. Inhabitants of Hyde ParkMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1891
  4. Lincoln v. City of BostonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1889
  5. Valvoline Oil Co. v. Inhabitants of WinthropMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1920

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Bradshaw v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1953
  2. Barton v. King CountyWashington Supreme Court · 1943
  3. Splinter v. City of NampaIdaho Supreme Court · 1953
  4. Abernathy v. City of ColumbiaSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1948
  5. Miles v. CommonwealthMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1934

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API