Miles v. Commonwealth
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
1Opinion of the CourtLummus, J.
The trial judge, in awarding damages to the petitioner, justifiably found that within the limits of a State highway in West Boylston, not “in the macadam surface of the highway, but . . . near that surface,” stood a maple tree. The evidence warranted a finding that the tree was about nine feet westerly of the westerly side of the macadam surface; that the branches overhung that surface so that one could drive thereon under them; and that, *244as the judge expressly found, the trunk of the tree was in a decayed and dangerous condition, and the Commonwealth had or by the exercise of proper care and…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Jones v. Town of Great BarringtonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1930
- Weare v. Inhabitants of FitchburgMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1872
- Wright v. City of ChelseaMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1911
- Andresen v. Inhabitants of LexingtonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1922
- Moran v. Inhabitants of PalmerMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1894
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Huff v. City of HolyokeMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1982
- Baird v. Massachusetts Bay Transportation AuthorityMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1992
- Twomey v. CommonwealthMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2005
- DiNitto v. Town of PepperellMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2010
- Longo v. Metropolitan District CommissionMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1964
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.