Legal Opinion

Miles v. Commonwealth

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided October 25, 1934PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLummus, J.

The trial judge, in awarding damages to the petitioner, justifiably found that within the limits of a State highway in West Boylston, not “in the macadam surface of the highway, but . . . near that surface,” stood a maple tree. The evidence warranted a finding that the tree was about nine feet westerly of the westerly side of the macadam surface; that the branches overhung that surface so that one could drive thereon under them; and that, *244as the judge expressly found, the trunk of the tree was in a decayed and dangerous condition, and the Commonwealth had or by the exercise of proper care and…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Jones v. Town of Great BarringtonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1930
  2. Weare v. Inhabitants of FitchburgMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1872
  3. Wright v. City of ChelseaMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1911
  4. Andresen v. Inhabitants of LexingtonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1922
  5. Moran v. Inhabitants of PalmerMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1894

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Huff v. City of HolyokeMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1982
  2. Baird v. Massachusetts Bay Transportation AuthorityMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1992
  3. Twomey v. CommonwealthMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2005
  4. DiNitto v. Town of PepperellMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2010
  5. Longo v. Metropolitan District CommissionMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1964

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API