Legal Opinion

Hayes v. Inhabitants of Hyde Park

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided May 18, 1891PublishedCited by 41 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHolmes, J.

This is an action to recover damages for perspnal injuries alleged to have been caused by a defect in the highway. The alleged defect was a telephone wire which sloped down from a house to which it was fastened, and lay across the highway. Whether the wire was broken before the time of the accident, or whether it still was attached on the other side of the way to another house five or six hundred feet away from the one first mentioned, is not very clear, and is not material. The only support which there had been between these two points was a bracket on a pole (in the road, as we understand),…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Carter v. TowneMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1868
  2. Elmer v. FessendenMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1890
  3. Pratt v. Inhabitants of WeymouthMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1888
  4. Boston & Albany Railroad v. ShanlyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1871
  5. Flagg v. Inhabitants of HudsonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1886

3Cited by41 opinions

  1. Burt v. Advertiser Newspaper Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1891
  2. Stone v. Boston & Albany RailroadMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1898
  3. Davis v. New York, New Haven, & Hartford RailroadMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1893
  4. Leahy v. Standard Oil Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1916
  5. Whalen v. Worcester Electric Light Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1940

36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API