Legal Opinion

Splinter v. City of Nampa

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided April 1, 1953No. 7828PublishedCited by 29 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*4TAYLOR, Justice.

Subsequent to the prior appeal herein, Splinter v. City of Nampa, 70 Idaho 287, 215 P.2d 999, 17 A.L.R.2d 665, and after defendants had answered, the cause was tried to a jury and judgment was entered on the verdict in favor of the plaintiff, Splinter, and against both defendants. Thereafter, the defendant, City of Nampa, filed its motion for judgment notwithstanding the verdict, based on the grounds (1) that the evidence is insufficient to support the verdict, and (2) evidence affirmatively shows that the plaintiff was guilty of contributory negligence. This motion was…

2Cases cited63 opinions

  1. Chicago, Milwaukee & St. Paul Railway Co. v. CooganSupreme Court of the United States · 1926
  2. United States v. RossSupreme Court of the United States · 1876
  3. Moore v. Chesapeake & Ohio Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1951
  4. Showalter v. Western Pacific RailroadCalifornia Supreme Court · 1940
  5. Pierstorff v. Gray's Auto ShopIdaho Supreme Court · 1937

58 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by29 opinions

  1. Henderson v. Cominco American, IncorporatedIdaho Supreme Court · 1973
  2. Ryals v. Broadbent Development Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1977
  3. Challis Irrigation Co. v. StateIdaho Court of Appeals · 1984
  4. Hale v. HeningerIdaho Supreme Court · 1964
  5. Petersen v. ParryIdaho Supreme Court · 1968

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API