Legal Opinion
State ex rel. McLean v. Industrial Commission
Ohio Supreme Court
Decided July 23, 1986No. 85-878PublishedCited by 39 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtDouglas, J.
The issue presented by this case is whether the commission abused its discretion and acted contrary to law by failing to award compensation pursuant to R.C. 4123.57(C) for loss of a leg. For the reasons set forth below, we hold that the Industrial Commission does not abuse its discretion in awarding a claimant who suffers an amputation of the lower limb below the knee, to which an effective prosthesis may be attached, compensation for the loss of a foot pursuant to R.C. 4123.57(C).
In accordance with Section 35, Article II of the Ohio Constitution and R.C. Chapter 4123, the Industrial…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- State ex rel. Teece v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1981
- Jones Metal Products Co. v. WalkerOhio Supreme Court · 1972
- State ex rel. Hutton v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1972
- State ex rel. Kramer v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1979
- Osai v. A & D Furniture Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1981
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by39 opinions
- 57 soc.sec.rep.ser. 220, Medicare & Medicaid Guide P 46,329 Robert Chambers v. Ohio Department of Human ServicesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1998
- TWISM Ents., L.L.C. v. State Bd. of Registration for Professional Engineers & SurveyorsOhio Supreme Court · 2022
- Maitland v. Ford Motor Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 2004
- Northwestern Ohio Building & Construction Trades Council v. ConradOhio Supreme Court · 2001
- Swallow v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1988
34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.