Legal Opinion

Osai v. A & D Furniture Co.

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided December 9, 1981No. 80-1632PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Per curiam

Appellant’s first proposition of law challenges the Court of Appeals’ assessment of treble damages within amended R. C. 1345.09, because the treble-damages provision of the statute was not in effect when the alleged violation occurred. The effective date of amended R. C. 1345.09(B), which includes the treble-damages clause, was April 11, 1978.

The events involving the basis for appellees’ complaint occurred in late 1977 and the initial complaint was filed in March, 1978, prior to the enactment of amended R. C. 1345.09(B). Consequently, the Court of Appeals erred in imposing treble damages…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. F. Enterprises, Inc. v. Kentucky Fried Chicken Corp.Ohio Supreme Court · 1976
  2. Perk v. City of EuclidOhio Supreme Court · 1969

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Roe v. Planned Parenthood Southwest Ohio RegionOhio Supreme Court · 2009
  2. French v. DwigginsOhio Supreme Court · 1984
  3. State ex rel. McLean v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1986
  4. Earl Evans Chevrolet, Inc. v. General Motors Corp.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1991
  5. State ex rel. Beacon Journal Publishing Co. v. Ohio Department of HealthOhio Supreme Court · 1990

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API