Legal Opinion

Rosales v. H.E. Butt Grocery Co.

Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)

Decided August 23, 1995No. 04-94-00284-CVPublishedCited by 52 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

CHAPA, Chief Justice.

ON APPELLEES’ MOTION FOR REHEARING AND MOTION FOR REHEARING EN BANC

Appellees’ motion for rehearing is denied, the opinion of this court issued on May 10, 1995, is withdrawn, and this opinion is substituted therefore.

Appellants Rolando Rosales and Esmeralda Cruz appeal a summary judgment granted in favor of appellees, H.E. Butt Grocery Company, Harvey Mabry, and Eva Wallace. Appellants originally filed suit in Maverick County, alleging causes of action of defamation, negligent and intentional infliction of emotional distress, and invasion of privacy. The trial court…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Mafrige v. RossTexas Supreme Court · 1994
  2. Ruiz v. Conoco, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 1994
  3. Wilson v. Texas Parks & Wildlife DepartmentTexas Supreme Court · 1994
  4. Public Utility Com'n of Texas v. CoferTexas Supreme Court · 1988
  5. Snyder v. PittsTexas Supreme Court · 1951

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by52 opinions

  1. GeoChem Tech Corp. v. VerseckesTexas Supreme Court · 1998
  2. Chiriboga v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co., Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)2003
  3. Denman v. Citgo Pipeline Co., Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana)2003
  4. Gerdes v. Kennamer, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District2005
  5. Killeen v. Lighthouse Electrical Contractors, L.P., Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)2007

47 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API