Legal Opinion

Denman v. Citgo Pipeline Co.

Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana)

Decided December 8, 2003No. 06-02-00130-CVPublishedCited by 46 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

Opinion by

Justice ROSS.

Don Denman and Peggy Denman, husband and wife, appeal the granting of Citgo Pipeline Company’s motion for summary judgment. The Denmans sued several defendants, including Citgo, for alleged contamination and injuries to their land caused by the presence of oil and gas equipment. The trial court concluded the Denmans, as subsequent purchasers of the property, lacked standing to bring suit for injuries that occurred before their purchase of the property.

The Denmans contend there are questions of fact, precluding summary judgment, as to whether Citgo still owns a…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Nixon v. Mr. Property Management Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1985
  2. City of Houston v. Clear Creek Basin AuthorityTexas Supreme Court · 1979
  3. Texas Ass'n of Business v. Texas Air Control BoardTexas Supreme Court · 1993
  4. Mayhew v. Town of SunnyvaleTexas Supreme Court · 1998
  5. Lear Siegler, Inc. v. PerezTexas Supreme Court · 1991

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by46 opinions

  1. Glover v. Union Pacific Railroad, Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana)2006
  2. Vial v. Gas Solutions, Ltd., Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana)2006
  3. Cook v. Exxon Corp., Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana)2004
  4. Prater v. State Farm Lloyds, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)2007
  5. West v. Brenntag Southwest, Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana)2005

41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API