Legal Opinion

GeoChem Tech Corp. v. Verseckes

Texas Supreme Court

Decided February 13, 1998No. 96-1121PublishedCited by 88 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtOwen, Justice

PHILLIPS, Chief Justice, GONZALEZ, HECHT, ENOCH, SPECTOR, ABBOTT and HANKINSON, Justices, join.

The issue in this case is whether a nonsuit fixes venue in the county to which transfer is sought when the nonsuit is taken after a motion to transfer has been filed but before a ruling on venue has been made. The court of appeals concluded that the effect of a nonsuit under our current rules of procedure is the same as it was under the former venue rules and held that venue was fixed in the county to which transfer was sought. 929 S.W.2d 85. We hold that the effect of a nonsuit depends on the state…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Ruiz v. Conoco, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 1994
  2. Wilson v. Texas Parks & Wildlife DepartmentTexas Supreme Court · 1994
  3. Snyder v. PittsTexas Supreme Court · 1951
  4. Rosales v. H.E. Butt Grocery Co., Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)1995
  5. Tempelmeyer v. BlackburnTexas Supreme Court · 1943

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by88 opinions

  1. In Re Team Rocket, L.P.Texas Supreme Court · 2008
  2. In Re Masonite Corp.Texas Supreme Court · 1999
  3. In Re Missouri Pacific Railroad Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1999
  4. Southern County Mutual Insurance Co. v. Ochoa, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District2000
  5. Perryman v. Spart an Tex. Six Capital Partners, Ltd.Texas Supreme Court · 2018

83 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API