Legal Opinion
Vigoro Industries, Inc. v. Cleveland Chemical Co. of Arkansas, Inc.
District Court, E.D. Arkansas
Decided November 4, 1994No. LR-C-93-672PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW
EISELE, District Judge.
This matter having been tried to the Court August 15-22, 1994, the Court makes the following findings and legal rulings regarding the liability of the remaining defendants in this case, Cleveland Chemical Company of Arkansas (“Cleveland Chemical”); James M. Sanders; Michael W. Sanders (hereinafter, Cleveland Chemical, James and Michael Sanders are collectively referred to as the Cleveland Defendants); Kenneth Crisp, Dennis E. Cavette, Don Scarbrough, Jr.; and Donald Washburn. The Court notes that the other named…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Duggin v. AdamsSupreme Court of Virginia · 1987
- ILG Industries, Inc. v. ScottIllinois Supreme Court · 1971
- Walt Bennett Ford, Inc. v. Pulaski County Special School DistrictSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1981
- AMP Inc. v. FleischhackerCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1987
- Rector-Phillips-Morse, Inc. v. VromanSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1973
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Dawson v. Temps Plus, Inc.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1999
- Saforo & Associates, Inc. v. Porocel Corp.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1999
- ConAgra, Inc. v. Tyson Foods, Inc.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 2000
- R.K. Enterprise, LLC v. Pro-Comp Management, Inc.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 2004
- ED NOWOGROSKI INC., INC. v. RuckerCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1997
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.