Legal Opinion
Duggin v. Adams
Supreme Court of Virginia
Decided October 9, 1987No. Record 840906PublishedCited by 206 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtStephenson, J.
The question presented in this appeal is whether a motion for judgment contains allegations sufficient to state a cause of action for tortious interference with a terminable-at-will sales contract.
*223Kenneth D. Duggin, Trustee, sued C. Douglas Adams, claiming that Adams tortiously interfered with Duggin’s contract rights with Betty B. Williams for the purchase of a tract of land in Fairfax County. Adams demurred to the allegations contained in Duggin’s motion for judgment. The trial court sustained the demurrer. After denying Duggin’s “Motion for Reconsideration and/or Leave to Amend,” the court…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Truax v. RaichSupreme Court of the United States · 1915
- Bowman v. State Bank of KeysvilleSupreme Court of Virginia · 1985
- Chaves v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Virginia · 1985
- Top Service Body Shop, Inc. v. Allstate InsuranceOregon Supreme Court · 1978
- Leigh Furniture and Carpet Co. v. IsomUtah Supreme Court · 1982
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by206 opinions
- Sterner v. Marathon Oil Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1989
- American Chiropractic Ass'n v. Trigon Healthcare, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2004
- Trau-Med of America, Inc. v. Allstate Insurance Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 2002
- Della Penna v. Toyota Motor Sales, USA, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1995
- Fox v. DeeseSupreme Court of Virginia · 1987
201 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.