ED NOWOGROSKI INC., INC. v. Rucker
Court of Appeals of Washington
1Opinion of the CourtColeman, J.
— Ed Nowogroski Insurance sued former employees for soliciting its clients with confidential information. The trial court ruled that the employees had misappropriated Nowogroski’s trade secrets by retaining and using client lists and other documents. But it awarded no damages for one individual’s solicitation of clients with memorized information. Because there is no legal distinction between written and memorized information under the Uniform Trade Secrets Act (UTSA), we hold that the memorized information also constituted trade secrets and remand for a recalculation of damages.
Nowogroski…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Boeing Company v. Sierracin CorporationWashington Supreme Court · 2000
- Price v. Kitsap TransitWashington Supreme Court · 1994
- J. L. Cooper & Co. v. Anchor Securities Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1941
- Ferrell v. CronrathWashington Supreme Court · 1965
- John Davis & Co. v. MillerWashington Supreme Court · 1918
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- Ed Nowogroski Insurance v. RuckerWashington Supreme Court · 1999
- ED NOWOGROSKI INS., INC. v. RuckerWashington Supreme Court · 1999
- Bliss Clearing Niagara, Inc. v. Midwest Brake Bond Co.District Court, W.D. Michigan · 2003
- Stevens v. GordonCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2003
- Stevens v. GordonCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2003
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.