Legal Opinion

Saforo & Associates, Inc. v. Porocel Corp.

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided May 27, 1999No. 98-1193PublishedCited by 39 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

W. H.“Dub” Arnold, Chief Justice.

This is a case involving the toll processing (i.e., processing for a fee) by appellee of raw material owned by appellant Saforo & Associates and alleged misappropriations by Saforo, as well as appellee’s former plant manager, appellant Williams Evans, and appellant GEO Specialty Chemicals, Inc., of trade secrets regarding the wash water system designed for that toll processing, in this case the washing step, of a raw material referred to as “Bayer Scale,” which is an alumina residue that has been used for various applications in the past and is currendy being…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Rad-Razorback Ltd. Partnership v. B.G. Coney Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1986
  2. Curtiss-Wright Corp. v. Edel-Brown Tool & Die Co., Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1980
  3. Crawford v. Arkansas Department of Human ServicesSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1997
  4. Sperry Rand Corporation, a Delaware Corporation v. A-T-O, Inc. (Formerly 'Automatic Sprinkler Corporation of America')Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1971
  5. State Ex Rel. Bryant v. R&A Investment Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1999

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by39 opinions

  1. Curtis Lumber Co., Inc. v. Louisiana Pacific Corp.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2010
  2. Bendinger v. Marshalltown Trowell Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1999
  3. Integrated Direct Marketing, LLC v. MayDistrict Court, E.D. Virginia · 2015
  4. Home Pride Foods, Inc. v. JohnsonNebraska Supreme Court · 2001
  5. ConAgra, Inc. v. Tyson Foods, Inc.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 2000

34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API